Challenge
Researchers frequently abandon publisher sites after encountering confusing or multi-step federated login flows. Too many clicks and uncertain outcomes break research flow, push users to workarounds, and erode trust. Seamless Access set out to clarify institutional login and access states—especially when an institution doesn’t provide access—to reduce confusion and drop-off.
Solution
We focused on the IdP (identity provider) filtering experience and the clarity of “no access” states. Two study rounds assessed comprehension of signals, reactions to messaging, and expected next steps.
- Round 1 (Unmoderated): 8 participants completed 3 IdP filtering tasks via a clickable desktop prototype.
- Round 2 (Moderated): 4 participants explored the same flows while we probed comprehension and expectations.
- Participants: 12 students (varied ages and countries). Average task time ~10 minutes; tasks generally completed successfully.
- Design focus: Clear iconography for “no access,” concise messaging, and useful next-step pathways when access is denied.
Results
- Learnable signal: The red warning indicator was quickly understood on repeat encounters as “no access / may not have access.”
- Expectation alignment: Participants equated signing in with gaining access; mixed outcomes after credential entry caused frustration.
- Trust preserved: When denied, users attributed the block to institutional subscription status, not to Seamless Access.
- Actionable next steps: “Add another institution” wasn’t helpful for most; guidance to contact the institution or view/purchase options was preferred.
- Ease ratings: Overall experience rated easy or very easy, with confusion mainly when “Access through institution” implied success but didn’t deliver full-text access.
Key Learnings
- Make signals obvious and consistent: Reduce cognitive load with simple, repeatable patterns for access vs. no-access states.
- Set expectations early: If credentials won’t guarantee access, say so up front and explain why.
- Offer viable paths when blocked: Provide institution contact guidance or purchase/view alternatives to keep users in flow and maintain trust.
What I Shipped / Recommendations
- Adopt the red “no access” indicator paired with concise, plain-language copy.
- Replace or qualify “Access through institution” when outcomes are uncertain; avoid over-promising in button labels.
- Swap “Add another institution” for clearer guidance (contact library/admin or explore purchase options).
- Keep messages short; avoid overcrowding buttons with extra text.